“open and honest debate” A Corpus Linguistic Analysis of a White House Press Briefing during the NSA Prism Scandal

briefings Capture 2

As we are witnessing the current NSA Prism scandal, I thought it would be interesting to have a look at a White House press briefing (transcripts can be found at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/press-briefings).

I used the transcription for the briefing held on June 11th, 2013. I cleaned the text very slightly by removing the words Mr. and Carney, as the press secretary’s name appears regularly on the transcript to indicate the speaker, and as this alters the data readings, I decided to remove them. The text in question contains 7,294 words; I was interested in looking at the keywords of the text, and in order to obtain a keywords list, I used Wordsmith. As a reference corpus, I used a section of the Westbury Lab Usernet Corpus, a 30 billion word corpus of news texts. (This corpus is available for download, but a BitTorrent and patience is required!:http://www.psych.ualberta.ca/~westburylab/downloads/usenetcorpus.download.html).

When I looked at the keywords, I found the following:


As can be seen, the keyword list is able to demonstrate the principle themes of the text, which include not only the NSA controversy, but also topics such as Syria and Nelson Mandela.

The word with the fourth highest level of keyness is debate, and I would like to focus some time on this.

And just to remind ourselves before continuing, the Oxford dictionary defines debate as follows:


A search of the concordance lines of this word gives the following:


I find it quite fascinating that the NSA Prism project, which until very recently remained secret, is now being constructed by the White House as something which:

he is interested and believes in a debate

spirited and animated debate

healthy debate

honest debate

important debate

merits debate

welcomes the debate

If this debate is so healthy, honest, important, merited and welcomed, why has it taken the actions of a whistleblower to make it happen?


4 thoughts on ““open and honest debate” A Corpus Linguistic Analysis of a White House Press Briefing during the NSA Prism Scandal

  1. hi
    great post.
    got a few questions if i may ask about the newsgroup reference corpus –
    why choose a newsgroup ref corpus?
    which sections from it did you use?
    how did you clean up the ref corpus for use?

    • Hello Mura,

      Many thanks for taking the time to read and comment. One of my aims when starting this blog was to be able to have dialogues with people who have similar research interests, so I’m pleased that you have got in touch. Initially, I downloaded the reference corpus so that I could have something of that size available for when I wanted to have a large reference corpus available. I am aware that perhaps it wasn’t the most ideal option, but I hoped that it wouldn’t affect the results detrimentally. If you’re interested in keyness, then perhaps you might find the link Costas gave me in another reply on the blog. He also suggests using SketchEngine rather than Wordsmith, which is something I’m going to look into.

      All the best,


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s